Not for Profit and For Profit Companies Under the same Leadership (why Essay

Not for Profit and For Profit Companies Under the same Leadership (why it can happen) - act ExampleThe authors results indicate that the risk propensity of entrepreneurs/not-for-profits companies are greater than that of managers. However, both are successful. Moreover, there are larger differences between entrepreneurs/not-for-profits companies whose primary goal is venture growth versus those whose focus is on producing family income. Results also accentuate the importance of precise construct definitions and rigorous measurement. The seek question of the journal was clearly specify. MacMillan, Siegal, and Narshimha (1994) examined the methods that venture capitalistic use to assess the senior managers of new ventures prior to making an investment decision. The lack of guess and experiential research in this area has led scholars to call for studies which examine the process of management team legal opinion in venture capital due diligence, as cited by Siegel, Siegel and Ma cMillan, 1993. This research article assessed that more research is needed on this subject matter, however the research question of the journal article was clearly defined there is a correlation between entrepreneurship behaviors and success. . ... The articles offer insight into the complex balancing act that well-situated entrepreneurism must execute to generate support form distinct stakeholder markets. The value this research provides is insight on well-to-do entrepreneurs/not-for-profits companies and financial success. The correlation between successful entrepreneurs/not-for- profits companies depicts the behavior pattern of the individuals capacity to ground relationships with private investors, foundations, venture capitalist or Angels instead of with the stakeholders monies. In turn, the literature suggests that a thriving entrepreneurs financial success is in how they treat the people who fund their cause. This reflects a preponderating logic of causation taking a part icular effect as giving and focusing on selection between means to cause this effect (Sarasvathy, 2001). The network theory, which is a social network approach, views organizations in society as a system of objects joined by a variety of relations. The goal of this experimental research analysis is to show that the behavior trait of being a builder of relationships is the cause of a thriving entrepreneurs financial success. This example is seen through the transition towards defining strategy as a perspective rather than a position, meaning that strategy is seen in wide terms, as the theory of the business (Drucker, 1994). However, the element of entrepreneurial leadership is not clearly present in the empirical evidence. entrepreneurial leadership is defined by Coven and Slevin (1991) as consisting of the following the nourishment of an entrepreneurial capability, protection of innovations that threaten